POL POT ( 1925 – 1998,) THE LEADER OF KHMER ROUGE REGIME AND THE GENOCIDE OF 3 MILLION CAMBODIANS.POL POT WAS NEVER BROUGHT TO TRIAL FOR HIS CRIMES.CAMBODIA REFUSED TO ESTABLISHMENT OF INTERNATIONAL WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL.

Cambodia: Sihanouk's love affair with North Korea.The Khmer Rouge’s  was a king , and life-long friend of North Korea.Sihanouk, the so called ‘King-Father’ of Cambodia , he didn’t have any gold medals to his name, although the totalitarian leader excelled elsewhere: he holds the Guinness World Record for the greatest number of political offices held by one individual.He was, across a six decade career, a prince, a king, a dictator, a president, a prime minister (twice), and a leader-in-exile. Kim Il-Sung loved the guy, and built him a huge Angkor Wat-style palace as a second home. When he died on 15 October, top DPRK officials were quick to send condolences for a man who was, for decades, one of Asia’s most infamous Cold War figures, and a friend of the Kim dynasty like few others. North Korea has lost one of its few true allies, and it could mark the end of a particularly special relationship between the DPRK and Cambodia.But a right-wing military coup toppled head of state Prince Norodom Sihanouk in 1970, the Khmer Rouge entered into a political coalition with him and began to attract increasing support.

Cambodia is a small nation of some 180,000 square kilometres, lying south-west of Vietnam and also sharing borders with Thailand and Laos. By 1960 Cambodia’s population was around six and a half million people, the majority peasant farmers. Like its northern neighbour Laos, Cambodia became an unwilling battleground in the Vietnam War. During the mid 1960s its eastern regions were infiltrated and invaded by North Vietnamese and Viet Cong troops. This led to American intervention in Cambodia, most noticeably a sustained bombing campaign. In the period 1969-70, the United States dropped more bombs on Cambodia than it had used in the entirety of World War II. This foreign intervention and disruption had a profound effect on Cambodia’s development. It contributed to the rise of the Khmer Rouge, a communist paramilitary that became one of the most murderous regimes in human history.The Cambodian-Vietnamese War , it seems to be very much accepted that the recent (1979–89) “war” was instigated by Khmer Rouge incursions into Vietnam that resulted in the deaths of many Vietnamese farmers and Cambodian refugees. Vietnam retaliated and was between the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and Democratic Kampuchea. However, the events have been forgotten by the rest of the world in comparison with the more widely known Vietnam War. Here are seven facts not known about the Cambodian-Vietnamese War.However, the events have been forgotten by the rest of the world in comparison with the more widely known Vietnam War. Here are seven less well-known facts about the Cambodian-Vietnamese War.The War started because Cambodia repeatedly invaded Vietnam, attempting to retake the Mekong River Delta. The country felt the area belonged to them and continuously raided Vietnamese areas on the border. Also, the Cambodian troops exterminated the Vietnamese living within Cambodia.The defining moment, however, came when the Khmer Rouge raided Ba Chuc and killed more than 3,000 Vietnamese. The massacre is still deeply felt today, and visitors can see memorials to the victims.The Cambodians leader at the time was a man considered to be one of the world’s cruelest leaders, Pol Pot. He was a dictator who caused the deaths of about 25 percent of the Cambodian population, or as many as three million people over the course of four years. The deaths were caused by a combination of executions, forced labor, and malnutrition.Cambodia, once part of French Indochina, is an ancient Hindu and Buddhist kingdom world famous for the beautiful temples at Angkor Wat. For many years it was ravaged by the effects of the Vietnam War and the oppressive regime of the evil Khymer Rouge. The country is now rehabilitated and, though poor, is again seeking to establish itself as a tourist destination and one of the friendliest countries in South East Asia. Even today the evidence of the war and the genocide is obvious on the streets as victims of landmines walk the streets and tourists are encouraged to visit the museums dedicated to the atrocities to ensure that the world does no forget the evil perpetrated in this beautiful place.Often overshadowed, in the west, by the contemporaneous events in neighboring Vietnam it is every bit as important that the world bears witness to the horrors of the Cambodian genocide as the Nazi holocaust or the death camps of Stalinist Russia. With that in mind here are 10 things everyone should know about the Cambodian genocide.Pol Pot’s communist Khmer Rouge initially gained significant public support due to their opposition of the previous regime and its support for the American bombing of North Vietnamese camps in the remote areas of Cambodia. The Khmer Rouge was, as a result, initially well supported by the North Vietnamese. Following a coup in 1970 Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge gained the unlikely support of the former ruler Prince Shianouk.As they gained power and influence in their own country the Khmer Rouge sought to purge those who had been trained and influenced by the Vietnamese. They subsequently started to espouse a more extreme form of communism. By 1975 the Khmer Rouge had taken the capital Phnom Penn and had control of the country. Having broken with their former Vietnamese patrons they looked towards communist China for support. They maintained control of the country until 1979 and, in those four years, oversaw the descent of the nation into hell.The Khmer Rouge were overthrown when the Vietnamese invaded Cambodia and installed their own regime. They continued to fight the new regime and, as the Vietnamese were viewed as an invading as opposed to liberating force, were viewed by the west as being the legitimate government of the country; they even retained control of the Cambodian seat at the United Nations until 1982. There are allegations that the US and UK provided support to the Khmer Rouge in their fight against Vietnam.Vietnam invaded Cambodia in 1978 in order to defeat Khmer Rouge troops. By now the world have known that Khmer Rouge was a vicious regime that committed genocidal crimes against its own people. Inspired by China’s Great Cultural Revolution in the 1960s, Polpot and his comrades vowed to “purify the masses of the Cambodians”, killing at least 1.5 million people. But little was known about the massacres and raids launched against Vietnamese civilians along Vietnam-Cambodia border during the 1975-1978 period, with the most brutal one being the 3000-death toll Ba Chuc massacre, 7 kilometres from the border. Vietnam’s attempts to seek a settlement with Cambodia failed. Finally, in response to a large scale attack (about 50,000 to 60,000 troops) from Khmer Rouge in Dec 1978, Vietnam started a full war against the Polpot’s regime.Khmer Rouge troops were quickly defeated; however, they withdrew to the Thailand-Cambodia border and remained active there for 15 more years thanks to the military and financial support from China and the tolerance of the then Thai government. China and the US were also very vocal about Vietnam invading a sovereign nation, demanding international sanctions against Vietnam while hiding the facts about the terrible regime that they supported. Their diplomatic campaign was a success. In subsequent years, Vietnam was met with much international criticism and severed diplomatic relations due to this campaign and also due to the fact that Vietnam’s troops remained in Cambodia for a long time (1979-1989), much in the same way that the USSR stayed in Afghanistan and the US in Iraq and Afghanistan recently.The problem really stems from the long period of occupation after the initial retaliation. The way I read it as an informed bystander is that the Vietnamese army really did not expect the Khmer Rouge to fold so quickly. Phnom Penh is 200 miles from Saigon but in 2 days or less, suddenly the Viet troops found themselves in the Cambodian capitol .The story then gets more complicated with the discovery of the Killing Fields, the Torture chambers of the Angkor regime under Pol Pot and the realization a huge percentage of the Cambodian population, especially the educated, the doctors and teachers and engineers had been put to death.

Pol Pot’s communist Khmer Rouge initially gained significant public support due to their opposition of the previous regime and its support for the American bombing of North Vietnamese camps in the remote areas of Cambodia. The Khmer Rouge was, as a result, initially well supported by the North Vietnamese. Following a coup in 1970 Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge gained the unlikely support of the former ruler Prince Shianouk.As they gained power and influence in their own country the Khmer Rouge sought to purge those who had been trained and influenced by the Vietnamese.

Prior to the Vietnam War Cambodia was led by Norodom Sihanouk, a charismatic young prince with a taste for Western culture, particularly the music of Elvis Presley. Sihanouk produced his own films, organised public processions and parades, and gave long, rambling speeches on Cambodian radio. Though not short on ego, Sihanouk was both a political progressive and a nationalist who wanted the best for its people. When the French granted Cambodia independence in 1953, Sihanouk took the radical step of abdicating as king and running as a democratic candidate. His popularity saw him elected as prime minister. Though initially pro-American, Sihanouk adopted a more neutral position following American military intervention in Vietnam in 1965. This placed Sihanouk and his government in a difficult position, given Cambodia’s extensive and largely uncontrolled land borders with Vietnam. Thousands of North Vietnamese Army (NVA), Viet Cong and Cambodian communists moved freely across these borders, using Cambodia’s eastern regions for stashing supplies, taking refuge and transiting men and material to South Vietnam. Cambodian farmers also traded rice and other products with communists soldiers and revolutionaries.Pol Pot lived a comfortable middle class childhood and came from a family with close connections to the Cambodian royal family. He was sent to be educated in Paris where he became involved with the French Communist Party. He idolized the Maoist view of the peasant rather than the Marxist view of the urban laborer as being the true base of the proletariat. This formed the basis of his desire to return Cambodia to a purely agrarian society. In 1962, Pol Pot found himself the leader of the Cambodian Communist following a purge of senior leaders by the Cambodian government.In 1978 Pol Pot made the mistake of calling for the killing of all Vietnamese within Cambodian borders. This was a direct cause of the later Vietnamese invasion and the overthrow of the Khmer Rouge regime. Pol Pot fled to Thailand and continued the fight against the new regime as the leader of the Khmer Rouge until his ‘retirement’ in 1985.He was arrested in 1997 and sentenced to house arrest by remaining members of the Khmer Rouge for the murder of a friend. He died in 1998 following an announcement that he would be sent to an international tribunal. He is officially said to have died from a heart attack but there are rumors that he chose to die by his own hand rather than face justice for his crimes.Imagine any country losing the majority of its scientists, teachers, doctors, engineers and forward thinkers in the space of 4 short years? Whatever ulterior motives Vietnam may or may not have had, Cambodia was in ruins and made dysfunctional by the actions of its own government.As far as the international condemnation, it is pretty obvious that China, US, Thailand etc did not want Vietnam to gain any sort of prestige or good will for their role in stopping Angkor’s psychopathic slaughter. So of course it is natural and understandable (from a political viewpoint) for the propaganda machines to start churning out anti-Vietnamese sentiment.Whether there was basis in some of the accusations, I will leave up to the more knowledgeable. But it does not require intellectual genius to see that many foreign powers did not want to see a strong Vietnam, especially one that was lauded by the international community for any sort of moral or military superiority.AFAIK, Cambodia setup its own destruction and is perhaps trying to save face by blaming anyone or everyone else. Again, this is not such an unusual human reaction. My guess is the children of serial killers must feel something similar.The real question is what we, as students of history and human nature and blessed with the ability to think, continue to believe. Is there really any doubt that the DK government in Cambodia in 1975 set out to destroy and obliterate much of the human and technical wealth of their own country.Pol Pot idolized the agrarian way of life and dreamed of creating a traditional society free from modern influence. Following the victory of the Khmer Rouge in 1975 they began to impose this vision of a warped utopia on their victims.Cambodia was sent back to ‘year zero’. Informing those who lived in the cities that they had to evacuate to escape expected bombing raids by the Americans (who had been providing support to the previous regime) almost everyone was herded into the countryside like cattle; anyone refusing or unable to move was shot. Many of the evacuees died from exhaustion or starvation on the forced marches to the countryside.Once in the countryside people were forced onto collective farms where they were made to live in communal barracks. With insufficient sanitary facilities disease was rampant and food shortages were common. People from the cities were left in no doubt that they were expendable being told ‘To keep you is no benefit; to destroy you is no loss’.Pol Pot once boasted that Cambodia would create a truly communist society ‘without wasting time on intermediate steps’. Many of the people working in the collective farms had little or no knowledge of agriculture. They were told that Cambodia could and should be self-sufficient in food terms and that production should be tripled in just one year. The Cambodian people were not, however, provided with any information or tools to help them establish the farms.In its pursuit of the perfect agrarian society the peasants were presented as ‘old people’ who led a traditional, rural life which everyone should strive to emulate. Those who came from the towns, people with any level of education, even those with useful (but non agrarian) skills such as doctors and dentists were viewed with suspicion.Anyone who had owned a business or a factory was murdered and even something as simple as wearing glasses could get someone killed (glasses were considered an unnecessary western ‘affectation’ and supposedly signified that the person wearing them was an intellectual) speaking a foreign language (due to the French colonial era many Cambodians spoke French) was enough of a reason to condemn someone to death.All religious and ethnic minority groups were viewed with suspicion and were therefore a target of the regime and anyone to ill, weak, disabled or old to work were seen as extraneous to the needs of society and frequently executed. Membership of the Khmer Rouge itself was not enough to protect people and many party members were culled on suspicion of sabotage. Nor could people rely on their ‘peasant’ status to keep themselves safe. The Khmer Rouge was not satisfied with its decimation of the Cambodian elite and, towards the end of their time in power they started to execute any peasant who dared to ‘use happy words’.Unlike other examples of genocides such as the Nazi extermination of Jews or the Rwandan massacres the Khmer Rouge did not limit their target to one particular group. They hated everyone with impunity and were quite happy to exterminate anyone who had the potential to cross them or interfere with their aims.Pol Pot gave a chilling summary of the aims of the Khmer Rouge when he said in 1978 that ‘there are no schools, faculties or universities because we wish to do away with all vestiges of the past. There is no money, no commerce as the state takes care of provisioning all its citizens.As it stands right now, of the many, many people who instigated and perpetrated the heinous crimes on the Cambodian people...only five have come to any sort of justice. And that sort of justice is not always what people would truly wish to happen. Kaing Guek Eav for example, might have been granted life in prison, but surely there are other sentences which could seem to bring him closer to the right amount of justice he deserves. And even given his life sentence, until the 2012 verdict, he was only going to end up serving a 19-year term. Nuon Chea, Pol Pot's second in command, as well as Kiehu Samphan were also sentenced to life in prison. Which will never seem long enough since they were mostly not tried until about the year 2000. And given that it took that long for anyone to bother persecuting against the horrifying regime, most of the villains, including Pol Pot, lived their lives fully, and died before justice could be had.

Black-clad Khmer Rouge soldiers charged into Phnom Penh and were welcomed with cheers, remembers Chhung Kong, a teacher in the Cambodian capital during the 1970s.Few foresaw the horrors that lay ahead as Pol Pot's communist army, victorious over the US-backed republican army of Lon Nol, seized control early on April 17, 1975.Four years later Chhung had lost 16 of his relatives to the regime, Phnom Penh was deserted and his school transformed into the Tuol Sleng, or S21, torture chamber - one of the most grotesque emblems of a paranoid rule that wiped out a quarter of Cambodia's population.


Living in a neighborhood of rising and falling big powers – French, American, Vietnamese, and now Chinese – Cambodia’s leaders have always wrestled with one constant – the need to get the geopolitics right.By 1974 the revitalised Khmer Rouge was drawing closer to victory against Lon Nol and his forces. The group was now under the autocratic control of Saloth Sar (or Pol Pot), a French-educated radical Marxist, who wanted to destroy the old institutions of Cambodia so they could be built anew. In April 1975, the Khmer Rouge seized control of Phnom Penh and the national government. Cambodia was restyled as Democratic Kampuchea, though its ‘democratic’ institutions were appointed, not elected. Power was exercised by a handful of Khmer Rouge figures, led by Pol Pot, who identified himself as “Brother Number One”. Pol Pot and his regime initiated one of history’s most radical national transformations – but what followed was one of history’s worst genocides.So first off. The Khmer Rouge would likely not have gained as much support as it did, if it did not oppose the former regime, and the American bombings of the North Vietnamese camps in Cambodia. A little bit of strategy there, since Pol Pot' regime would later eliminate every Vietnamese person in his country. But that was a good strategy it seemed. Thanks to opposing the Americans at the outset, and eliminating Vietnamese towards the end, this allowed the Cambodian Communist regime under Pol Pot to be seen as the legitimate government. Even after Vietnam came in, saw the horrors there, and pushed the Khmer Rouge out. But the Cambodian genocidal party still held the U.N. seat until 1982! And of course it doesn't help at all that it is constantly rumoured that both the United States, and the United Kingdom supported the Khmer Rouge because of their mutual opposition to Vietnam. In order to build their new agrarian society the Khmer Rouge attempted to wipe out all evidence of any other type of life. Factories, schools, universities and hospitals were shut down as they were superfluous to the needs of the new regime. Some were put to new ‘appropriate’ uses such as prison camps.Emotions were banned; people had to cultivate a complete lack of any kind of facial or body language emotional response to situations. Falling in love was anathema, marriages were contracted by the state and any couple found engaged in (and enjoying) sexual relations not specifically permitted by the Khmer Rouge could result in the people involved being sent to a prison camp. Families were broken up between different farms with no effort being made to keep them together.Religion was termed reactionary and all religious worship was banned. Personalized clothing was seen as an extravagance; all Cambodian had to wear a black uniform and were not permitted to move away from the collective farm they were assigned to.Modern, energy saving appliances were gathered together and destroyed. The victory of the Khmer Rouge led to things such as fridges, music players and air conditioners being gathered together and burned in the street. Music in all forms was banned, as was reading (books went up in flames to prove the point) and money disappeared from use.Perhaps one of the most under-the-radar genocides in history, Pol Pot's Killing Fields in Cambodia saw the death of millions of men, women and children. And each one of these deaths, almost without exception, was gruesome, tortuous, and agonizing. And it doesn't help that, at least at the start, the Cambodian government was supported by the Allies, thanks to the Vietnam War.But given the waste of that war, effort could certainly have been better spent, overthrowing the incredibly insane dictatorship of Pol Pot, and his vision of a better world. Anyone who seemed to use any form of modern technology was immediately brought under suspicion. And they were basically never given a chance for defense. Suspicion essentially meant guilt.And the methods of death were absolutely appalling. From bayoneting babies, and smashing their skulls in, to burning people alive, and beating them to death with farm tools...the mass murdering that led to the mass graves, dotting Cambodia were all dug by the very people who occupied them. And these places were to be known as the Killing Fields of Cambodia.So Pol Pot's plan, with regards to the elimination of modern learning, and comforts, brought him to accept the idea of "year zero". Essentially this served two different functions. Not only did it signify a new era for Cambodia, but also it signified a reverting back to a time where there was no modern technology, or learning. He forced people to leave the cities, and citizens were marched to farming communities. Those who resisted were murdered, and many also simply died of exhaustion along the way. Given that most of the people who were marched from the cities to the country had no knowledge of how to cultivate a farm, many people starved. And those who didn't starve to death were more than likely to contract some sort of disease or infection due to poor sanitary conditions. S-21, or what was once known as Tuol Sleng, was a school turned into a prison for those slated to be slaughtered. Only a handful of people who were held captive here ever made it through the torture, and escaped death. People were tortured here until they would pen and sign confessions to state that they opposed the regime so that their deaths could be seen as execution for crimes. Of course many died during torture, and certain executions were simply conducted in the building itself. But they were mostly shipped off to nearby killing fields and done away with next to the mass graves in which they'd be buried. Symbolically, this was the best, and most perverted place for Pol Pot to have such a prison of torture and "re-education". He essentially sought to rid his country of learning. And effectively did so in more ways than one.This horribly disgusting little grotesque man managed to avoid ever being brought to justice for the his leadership in the murder of over two million people. And it should be pointed out that he did not only murder his own people. He also ordered the slaughter of every Vietnamese person within Cambodian borders. This spurred Vietnam on to invade Cambodia shortly thereafter, driving Pol Pot from power. He escaped to Thailand, and continued on as the leader of the Khmer Rouge until 1985. In 1997, he was placed under house arrest for murdering a so-called friend of his. It wasn't until 1998 (twenty years after the mass murder of over two million people) that he was slated to appear at an international tribunal. He died before he was brought to justice. Many speculate that he committed suicide to avoid facing punishment for his crimes.

Cambodia: Khmer Rouge leaders Pol Pot and Ieng Sary meet Chairman Mao Zedong, Beijing, 1976. Relations between Phnom Penh and Washington became more difficult and began to sour. In May 1965 it collapsed altogether when Sihanouk broke off diplomatic relations with the US, a move that curtailed US aid to Cambodia. Sihanouk decided to develop a relationship with China, a nation he correctly believed would eventually dominate the Asian hemisphere.


China’s punishment of Vietnam came on Feb.17, barely two weeks after Deng returned from the United States. China’s cross border attack on Northern Vietnam was purely punitive. Vietnamese troops remained in Cambodia for a decade.Among the Khmer Rouge defectors brought to Phnom Penh in January 1979, was Hun Sen, Cambodia’s future prime minister. During seven years fighting with the Khmer Rouge, Hun Sen had risen to the rank of Eastern Battalion Commander. In June, 1977 he fled with his cadres to Vietnam.Schaefer said the Vietnamese constantly complained over the years to their East German partners that it was hard to determine the real backgrounds of Khmer defectors in exile or cadres volunteering for work in Vietnamese-occupied Cambodia.As a leader of the Vietnamese-sponsored rebel army, Hun Sen was appointed Deputy Prime Minister of the Vietnamese-installed People’s Republic of Kampuchea.Initially, Hun Sen appears rarely in files that Schaefer read. In 1981, he briefed Communist bloc ambassadors that a Cambodian government member had been purged and detained by the Vietnamese “for not fulfilling his internationalist duties.”Fulfilling internationalist duties” was a code phrase for fully cooperating with Vietnam. Cambodian “nationalism” as defined by Vietnam meant opposition to Vietnam’s occupation.In contemporary Cambodia, the political opposition takes a strong anti-Vietnamese stance. Schaefer says that modern politics blind many young Cambodians to the realities of 1978, a time when no end was in sight to the Khmer Rouge nightmare.They did not primarily act because they wanted to end the genocide,’ Schaefer said, referring to the Khmer Rouge rule. During nearly four years in power, Khmer Rouge implemented policies that killed about one quarter of Cambodia’s population. “They wanted to get rid of an anti-Viet Nam government, and put in a pro-Viet Nam government. And in doing so, they got rid of the Khmer Rouge government. And that is a fact.”There were so many methods of torture with regards to Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge that it is simply unbelievable. Iron beds were loaded into prisons like S-21, with restraints attached to make torture easier (though some people were simply burned alive on these very beds). Vivisections were common, where a victim would be cut open, and have their organs pulled from their body, whilst both conscious, and without anesthetic. Some people were slowly drowned. Others were slowly drained of their blood to see how long they could survive. Electric shock was also used...and for those prisoners who caused the administration the most grief they were skinned alive. And of course there was the added psychological torture of watching children being beat against trees and posts. That alone must have made people beg for death.Cambodia refused to permit the establishment of a Yugoslav style international war crimes tribunal. They have, however, come together with the United Nations to set up the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia to prosecute the crimes perpetrated by the Khmer Rouge, sadly because the court was not established until 2003 many of the guiltiest parties, including Pol Pot, had already evaded justice through death.Five people have been charged with crimes before the court. Of these the most notorious was Kang Kek Iew  who ran the infamous S-21. He had converted to Christianity in the interim time and admitted his responsibility and guilt and even asked for his victims to allow the possibility of forgiveness. He was sentenced to 35 years in jail and by reason of credit for time served pre-trial and time for good behavior he will serve a sentence of only 19 years. Whether or not the God he now claims to worship will forgive him for the horrors he perpetrated on his fellow men and, in particular the deaths of 2000 little children, only Comrade Duch will ever know.Other people who have appeared before the court include Nuon Chea (Brother Number Two to Pol Pot’s Brother Number One), the chief architect of the agrarian ideal and the Year Zero plan. He will serve the rest of his life in prison. Kiehu Samphan, the Khmer Rouge Head of State from 1976 to the fall of the regime was also sentenced to life in prison.The only other two people charged have managed to escape the wrath of the court. Ieng Sary, Brother Number Three who was the Khmer Rouge Minister for Foreign Affairs and Deputy Prime minister died before his trial was finished. Ieng Thirith, his wife, was the Khmer Rouge Minister or Social Affairs and responsible for many of the Khmer Rouge’s purges. She was declared medically unfit to stand trial.The whole trial process has been slow and deeply unsatisfactory for many of the ordinary Cambodians who are still traumatized by memories of that time.The Cambodian Genocide did not happen in the mists of some dark distant time, it did not happen in some obscure corner of the globe. In the years leading up to the genocide the attention of the world and its super-powers was focused on South East Asia, it happened within living memory. Babies born in the west at the same time as those whose brains were bashed out against trees celebrated the turn of the millennium as college students.Those people who endured the terrors of the Khmer Rouge were saved only by the Vietnamese Invasion (after which they endured even more suffering) and received aid only from the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies. Caught on the wrong side of cold war politics these victims were conveniently forgotten by the west. There are even allegations that the US and UK supported the Khmer Rouge government in exile with weapons, training and funding (although to be fair such allegations are rarely substantiated and usually come from very far left sources who have an interest in blackening the reputations of the right wing Reagan and Thatcher governments of the time).Cambodia is still dealing with the ravages of the genocide and its aftermath. A whole generation is scarred by the atrocities witnessed and many lack a decent or even a basic education. Many in government were once involved with the Khmer Rouge and it will take many years for the nation to be at ease with itself once more. It is all too easy to read about such events and promise ‘never again’. We educate our children on the Nazi Holocaust to ensure that it acts as a warning to future generations. Hopefully the mute charnel houses of Cambodia will be as powerful a signal to the future as the terrifying gates of Auschwitz.

On this day in 1975, Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge captured Cambodia’s capital Phnom Penh and declared revolutionary Year Zero. After five years of bloody civil war, the conquering Communist guerrillas were welcomed as heroes by a relieved population desperate for peace – but the relief was to be short-lived. Within twenty-four hours, members of the deposed Lon Nol government, public servants, police, military officers, ethnic Vietnamese, Christian clergy, Muslim leaders and middle-class citizens were identified and executed. Schoolteachers, students, doctors and those who simply wore glasses or knew how to read were murdered for being “intellectuals”. Foreigners were expelled, embassies closed and the currency abolished.

Comment Box is loading comments...